Governance and decision making#
This page describes the groups with decision-making authority in the project, as well as the processes and policies we follow.
In short, here is the decision making process that we follow:
All organizational policy is defined in this Team Compass.
Most day to day decisions are made by
Team members are expected to follow inclusive team practices when making decisions, and to actively share information and collaborate with one another.
There are a few kinds of decisions that require specific process or decision makers.
Changes to the MyST specification follow the MyST specification decision making process.
Changes to team policy follow the team policy decision making process.
Members of the
Steering Councilmay vote to break ties if decision making is at an impasse in any part of the organization.
Sources of Truth#
This Team Compass repository is the source of truth for all team policy, unless explicitly delegated elsewhere.
Code of Conduct#
Our Code of Conduct defines acceptable and unacceptable behavior for any individual participating in an Executable Books space (online or in-person). It also defines mechanisms for reporting violations and processes for dealing with them.
See Code of Conduct for more information.
The MyST Specification#
The MyST Specification is defined at executablebooks/myst-spec. It uses a combination of documentation, examples, schemas, tests, etc to define MyST markdown in a form that can be used to implement parsers and renderers. It is versioned and includes “releases” in order to make it easy for downstream implementors to track the changes they need to make.
This repository will need to be modified as-needed to be the source of truth for the MyST Specification, and to have enough information to teach newcomers about its structure and function. One example for inspiration: the Zarr specifications page. Here’s a comment with some suggestions for what is missing.
Take the following steps for changing any policy, strategy, or governance aspect of the Team Compass.
Open an issue to explain the policy that you’d like to change, and why. Here is a rough template to follow:
## Context provide context needed to understand this proposal. Describe the problem this proposal will solve. ## Proposal describe your proposal in informal but specific terms. ## Impact describe the implications of this proposal and the impact it will have.
Discuss and incorporate feedback with others on the team. If there are objections or suggestions, do your best to incorporate them into your proposal.
Make a pull request to the
Team Compassrepository (or another location if appropriate) and link it to the issue. This is the “formal change” that you wish to make.
Make a decision. Steering Council members may approve PRs to change policy. To approve a change, use the “Approve” feature in the GitHub UI. To request blocking changes, use the “Request Changes” feature in the GitHub UI (see How and when to block proposals). PRs to change organizational policy may be merged when the following conditions are met:
Have been open either for five working days or up until all Steering Council members
Approvalfrom at least one Steering Council member
Request Changesfrom a Steering Council member.
If there are unresolveable objections from a Steering Council member, a decision to merge is made with a majority vote.
The MyST Specification#
We use a special process called MyST Enhancement Proposals to change the MyST Specification. See MyST Enhancement Proposals for more details.
Guidelines for decision making#
How and when to block proposals#
When blocking any change or objecting to a proposal, provide a rationale for what must be changed and why you believe it is critically important. Do not disapprove because of differences in opinion. Only disapprove if you have a major strategic concern. See Strategies for integrating objections for what we are aiming for.